Time Management Is a Decision-Making Problem

Early in my career, I worked in event sales and marketing, where timelines were not suggestions. They were fixed, visible, and often public. A ballroom does not wait. A client keynote does not move. A guest list does not forgive disorganization. At the time, I though I was learning how to manage events. What I was actually learning was how to manage people's time, energy, and confidence under pressure. There was one particular stretch during a multi-week corporate event series. We had overlapping client demands, last-minute changes to programming, and a team that was technically capable but constantly reacting. Everyone was busy, but not quite effective. You could feel it in the room. Quick decisions were being made without context. Tasks were getting done, but not always the right ones.

The pace was high. The clarity was low.

That was the first time I realized that time management is not just about productivity and pretty looking calendars. It is about alignment. and decision-making. Instead of pushing the team to move faster, I was inspired to start asking better questions and partner with my manager, and mentor to get this project rolling.. Where is time actually going? What decisions are being delayed? What is unclear? Where did the escalations flow to? We ran a simple audit across one week. Not a formal system, just a shared breakdown of how time was being spent across sales, client communication, internal coordination, and execution. What we surfaced in these discussions was fragmentation.

Sales was chasing details that should have been confirmed earlier. Marketing was revising materials too close to deadlines because approvals were unclear. Operations was stepping into solve problems that had no clear owner. So we changed the structure before the workload by introducing a weekly planning rhythm that forced prioritization early. We clarified ownership so decisions did not stall. We grouped similar work into focused blocks, which reduced context switching and improved follow-through.

Around that time, I also recalled some decision-making best practices, including some frameworks from University of Massachusetts Dartmouth that I used when considering colleges. What stood out was how often teams fail despite capability, due to skipping essential steps in the decision process. I could have smacked my forehead when I realized we were doing exactly that. We were jumping from problem to action without clearly defining what we were solving. We were gathering information too late. We were defaulting to the fastest option instead of evaluating the right one.

Once we applied a more structured approach, everything shifted.

We defined decision clearly at the outset. We gathered the right inputs earlier in the process. We explored more than one viable path before committing. And we evaluated those options against what actually mattered, including timeline, cost, and client experience. Since we were a hospitality brand, that last one was our north star. Execution became cleaner. Fewer surprises. Fewer last-minute escalations. And a noticeable increase in team confidence because decisions felt grounded instead of rushed.

One of the simplest but most impactful changes was how we treated urgency. Not everything needed to be done immediately. Separating what was important from what simply felt urgent gave the team permission to focus on work that actually moved the event forward. This behavioral changed fueled by research and collaboration. Team members came into meetings prepared instead of reactive. Conversations became more strategic because there was space to think ahead. Relationships improved because communication became more intentional and expectations were clearer.

Looking back, that experience shaped how I approach my work today.

Leaders often believe they need more time. In reality, they need better structure around how time is used and how decisions are made. Time management, at its core, is an operational discipline. It reveals where systems break down, where decision-making lacks clarity, and where priorities are misaligned with execution. The goal is not to fill every hour. It is to ensure that time is spent in a way that supports strategy. When you improve how a team uses its time and how it makes decisions, you create the conditions for better thinking, stronger relationships, and more confident execution.

This is where performance begins to scale.

For organization scaling beyond informal coordination, structured decision-making becomes a competitive advantage. My advisory engagements are designed to build that infrustructure across leadership, operations, and growth.

Inquire about fractional Chief of Staff Support.